Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir pro rodapé

Pesquisa Científica

v. 33 n. 92 (2024): ROBRAC

Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal efficacy using various final irrigation protocols: a SEM study

  • Maura Cristiane Gonçales Orçati Dorilêo
  • Orlando Aguirre Guedes+
  • Letícia Junqueira de Pádua Sesti Gomes Moussa
  • Cyntia Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela
  • Helder Fernandes de Oliveira
  • Andreza Maria Fábio Aranha
  • Alcides Gonini Junior
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36065/robrac.v33i92.1776
Enviado
August 29, 2024
Publicado
December 6, 2024

Resumo

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of 0.2% Chitosan and 17% EDTA, with or without ultrasonic activation, in removing the smear layer (SL). Methods: Fifty bovine incisors were sectioned 17 mm from their apices, instrumented using ProTaper Universal instruments and divided into five groups (n=10): I- Distilled water + conventional irrigation (CI) (control), II- 17% EDTA + CI, III- 0.2% Chitosan + CI, IV- 17% EDTA + passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and V- 0.2% Chitosan + PUI. The roots were split longitudinally and examined under a scanning electron microscope at 500x magnification to assess SL removal. SL presence was scored by three blinded examiners using a five-point scale. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests (p<0.05). Results: The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in SL removal among groups (p<0.05). Group IV (EDTA + PUI) exhibited significantly higher removal efficacy than other groups (p<0.05). SL removal was highest in the cervical third compared to middle and apical thirds. Conclusions: EDTA combined with PUI demonstrated superior SL removal.